↓ Skip to main content

Psicose e esquizofrenia: efeitos das mudanças nas classificações psiquiátricas sobre a abordagem clínica e teórica das doenças mentais

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psicose e esquizofrenia: efeitos das mudanças nas classificações psiquiátricas sobre a abordagem clínica e teórica das doenças mentais
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, August 2016
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702016005000018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Tenório

Abstract

This article discusses changes in the diagnostic classification systems for mental illness, especially the conceptual weakening of the "psychosis" category while schizophrenia became the only psychosis. Current pathological classifications prioritize a physicalist approach. Consequently, conditions that previously were associated with neurosis and subjectivity are being medicalized, conditions previously recognized as psychotic are relocated under the heading of personality disorders, and psychosis has been reduced to schizophrenia and considered a deficit of psychic functions. This article indicates the clinical and operational validity of the notion of "psychosis" as a nosographic category permitting a more complex approach to "schizophrenia", which in psychiatry is the last concept that bears the symbolic weight of madness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,926,785
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#125
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,315
of 357,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.