↓ Skip to main content

From environmental ethics to environmental bioethics: antecedents, trajectories, and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From environmental ethics to environmental bioethics: antecedents, trajectories, and perspectives
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702017000200005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Luciane Fischer, Thiago Cunha, Valquiria Renk, Anor Sganzerla, Juliana Zacarkin dos Santos

Abstract

The relationship between humans and the environment became an ethical problem in the twentieth century, when accelerated economic and scientific development was accompanied by profound alterations in global ecological systems. In response, environmental ethics called for limits in the dichotomous relationship between man and nature. In 1970, Van Potter proposed bioethics as the interdisciplinary study of "human survival." Subsequently, the discipline focused on clinical and hospital conflicts. Environmental bioethics is analyzed in this article as a theoretical perspective that has historically drawn on Van Potter's approach to bioethics, marked by the interpersonal, socioeconomic, and political dimensions of environmental ethical dilemmas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 2 3%
Professor 2 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 24 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Psychology 5 9%
Philosophy 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 25 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,121,044
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#255
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,973
of 324,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.