You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A avaliação da produtividade científica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0104-59702017000300005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcos Antônio Mattedi, Maiko Rafael Spiess |
| Abstract |
The paper examines the evaluation of scientific productivity. It analyzes the metrification of the evaluation of scientific production, as well as the historical construction, and current uses of scientific evaluation. It argues that this process contains a paradox: the more that metrics become impersonal, the less they are recognized by scientists. The study is divided into five sections: contextualization of the problematics of scientific evaluation; a description of the main stages in the institutionalization of metrification; an overview of the development of the main evaluation indexes; some examples of the application of these indexes; and analytical consequences and recommendations for the formulation of a new evaluation agenda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 27% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,996,829
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#135
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,528
of 324,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.