You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Propriedades físicas e mecânicas da madeira Tatajuba (Bagassa guianensis) proveniente de duas diferentes regiões brasileiras
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1517-707620180003.0519 |
| Authors |
Tales Fernando Pegoraro Lima, Tiago Hendrigo de Almeida, Diego Henrique de Almeida, André Luis Christoforo, Francisco Antonio Rocco Lahr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 2 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,487,737
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
#7
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,871
of 348,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them