↓ Skip to main content

Reflexiones en comunidad de práctica sobre Triángulos imposibles en clase de matemáticas

Overview of attention for article published in Educacao e Pesquisa, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflexiones en comunidad de práctica sobre Triángulos imposibles en clase de matemáticas
Published in
Educacao e Pesquisa, December 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1517-9702201611150509
Authors

Luis Alexander Conde Solano, Sandra Evely Parada Rico, Jorge Enrique Fiallo Leal

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,741,701
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Educacao e Pesquisa
#129
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,576
of 420,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educacao e Pesquisa
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.