↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and surgical assistance in prostate cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: implementation of assistance protocols

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and surgical assistance in prostate cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: implementation of assistance protocols
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, July 2020
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.s106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Rodriguez Sanchez, Xavier Cathelineau, Alexis M. Alva Pinto, Ángel Borque-Fernando, Maria Jesús Gil, Chi-Hang Yee, Rafael Sanchez-Salas

Abstract

Propose an approach of prostate cancer (PCa) patients during COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a review of current literature related to surgical and clinical management of patients during COVID-19 crisis paying special attention to oncological ones and especially those suffering from PCa. Based on these publications and current urological guidelines, a manual to manage PCa patients is suggested. Patients suffering from cancer are likely to develop serious complications from COVID-19 disease together with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the management of oncological patients should be taken into special consideration and most of the treatments postponed. In case the procedure is not deferrable, it should be adapted to the current situation. While the shortest radiotherapy (RT) regimens should be applied, surgical procedures must undergo the following recommendations proposed by main surgical associations. PCa prognosis is generally favourable and therefore one can safely delay most of the biopsies up to 6 months without interfering with survival outcomes in the vast majority of cases. In the same way, most of the localised PCa patients are suitable for active surveillance (AS) or hormonal therapy until local definitive treatment could be reconsidered. In metastatic as well as castration resistant PCa stages, adding androgen receptor targeted agents (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide) to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) could be considered in high risk patients. On the contrary, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Radium-223 must be avoided with regard to the consequence of hematologic toxicity and risk of COVID-19 infection because of immunodepression. Most of the biopsies should be delayed while AS is advised in those patients with low risk PCa. ADT allows us to defer definitive local treatment in many cases of intermediate and high risk PCa. In regard to metastatic and castration resistant PCa, combination therapies with abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide could be considered. Chemotherapy, Radium-223 and immunotherapy are discouraged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 14 10%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 46 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 53 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,984,227
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#289
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,917
of 432,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.