↓ Skip to main content

Neurogenic bladder – concepts and treatment recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurogenic bladder – concepts and treatment recommendations
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, April 2022
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0098
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Carlos Truzzi, Fernando Gonçalves de Almeida, Carlos Alberto Sacomani, Joceara Reis, Flávio Eduardo Trigo Rocha

Abstract

Bladder and urinary sphincter malfunctioning that results from some change in the central and/or peripheral nervous system is defined as neurogenic bladder. The urinary tract symptoms that can be related to its filling, emptying, or both have a significant impact on the quality of life of individuals. The present review was based on the document prepared for the public health system in Brazil as a treatment guidelines proposal. Survey questions were structured as per PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome). Search strategies were defined and performed in the MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar databases. The selection of articles followed the evidence hierarchy concept; evidence body was identified, and the quantitative study data were extracted. The quality of evidence and grade of recommendation were qualitatively assessed according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). A total of 2.707 articles were identified, with 49 of them being selected to compose the basis for this review. Neurogenic bladder treatments were classified according to their focus on filling or emptying symptoms and sub- classified in pharmacological and surgical treatments. Treatment guidelines are important tools for the public health system to promote the best practice when treating neurogenic bladder patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 4 6%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 35 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 37 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,361,749
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#130
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,198
of 447,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.