↓ Skip to main content

SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus infections: are there differences in clinical presentation, laboratory abnormalities, and outcomes in the pediatric population?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus infections: are there differences in clinical presentation, laboratory abnormalities, and outcomes in the pediatric population?
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/s1678-9946202264034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Fernanda Bádue Pereira, Priscila Suguita, Nadia Litvinov, Sylvia Costa Lima Farhat, Camila Sanson Yoshino de Paula, Carolina Dos Santos Lázari, Pedro Vale Bedê, Juliana Valeria de Souza Framil, Catarina Bueno, Priscila Cristina Abduch Adas Branas, Irina Monteiro da Costa Guimarães, Marcia Marques Leite, Ana Carolina Barsaglini Navega, Danilo Yamamoto Nanbu, Claudio Schvartsman, João Renato Rebello Pinho, Clovis Artur Almeida Silva, Heloisa Helena de Sousa Marques, Adriana Pasmanik Eisencraft, Alfio Rossi, Artur Figueiredo Delgado, Gabriela Nunes Leal, Maria Augusta Cicaroni Gibelli, Patricia Palmeira, Neusa Keico Sakita, Emilly Henrique Dos Santos, Mussya Cisotto Rocha, Kelly Aparecida Kanunfre, Thelma Suely Okay, Magda Carneiro-Sampaio, Werther Brunow de Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Chemical Engineering 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#358
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,447
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.