↓ Skip to main content

A workshop on asthma management programs and centers in Brazil: reviewing and explaining concepts*

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A workshop on asthma management programs and centers in Brazil: reviewing and explaining concepts*
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132015000100002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Stelmach, Alcindo Cerci Neto, Ana Cristina de Carvalho Fernandez Fonseca, Eduardo Vieira Ponte, Gerardo Alves, Ildely Niedia Araujo-Costa, Laura Maria de Lima Belizário Facury Lasmar, Luci Keiko Kuromoto de Castro, Maria Lucia Medeiros Lenz, Paulo Silva, Alberto Cukier, Alexssandra Maia Alves, Aline Silva Lima-Matos, Amanda da Rocha Oliveira Cardoso, Ana Luisa Godoy Fernandes, Bruno Piassi de São-José, Carlos Antônio Riedi, Deborah Schor, Décio Medeiros Peixoto, Diego Djones Brandenburg, Elineide Gomes dos Santos Camillo, Faradiba Sarquis Serpa, Heli Vieira Brandão, João Antonio Bonfadini Lima, Jorge Eduardo Pio, Jussara Fiterman, Maria de Fátima Anderson, Maria do Socorro de Lucena Cardoso, Marcelo Tadday Rodrigues, Marilyn Nilda Esther Urrutia Pereira, Marti Antila, Sonia Maria Martins, Vanessa Gonzaga Tavares Guimarães, Yara Arruda Marques Mello, Wenderson Clay Correia de Andrade, William Salibe-Filho, Zelina Maria da Rocha Caldeira, Álvaro Augusto Souza da Cruz-Filho, Paulo Camargos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Librarian 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 19%
Social Sciences 11 16%
Psychology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#268
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,586
of 359,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#18
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.