↓ Skip to main content

Proposal of nursing care plan in people hospitalized with AIDS*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proposal of nursing care plan in people hospitalized with AIDS*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, March 2017
DOI 10.1590/s1980-220x2016027203204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Lino de Souza, Richardson Augusto Rosendo da Silva, Cristiane da Costa Silva, Rosangela Vidal de Negreiros, Cintia Capistrano Teixeira Rocha, Maria Miriam Lima da Nóbrega

Abstract

OBJECTIVE to elaborate and validate a proposal for a nursing care plan in people hospitalized with AIDS, in an infectious disease unit, using ICNP® version 2015. METHODS A cross-sectional study, followed by validation of content, performed with 20 nurses and 120 people, living with AIDS in an infectious disease unit of a hospital of infectious diseases in Northeast Brazil. The methodological trajectory was carried out in the following stages: elaboration of the diagnosis, nursing outcomes; Initial proposal of nursing interventions; Preparation of a care plan; And validation of the plan by field experts. RESULTS 42 diagnoses were elaborated and validated, 33 presented CVI > 0.80 (55.42%) among field experts. From this quantitative, 228 interventions were elaborated and 41 obtained a CVI > 0.80 (44.78%), considered validated. CONCLUSION The study allowed us to identify and validate nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions for the use in clinical practice, aiming to subsidize the process of care for people with AIDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 25 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#567
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,817
of 323,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.