You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elementos do paradigma sociocrítico nas práticas do cuidado de enfermagem: revisão integrativa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2016037003267 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvana Ceolin, Manuelle Arias Piriz, Marjoriê da Costa Mendieta, José Siles González, Rita Maria Heck |
| Abstract |
Analyze the evidence available in Brazilian theses on the elements of the socio-critical paradigm in the construction of knowledge and practices of nursing care. An integrative literature review was carried out in the Theses Database of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel and the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Of a total of 320 theses, only 19 had elements of the socio-critical paradigm in their construction, among which the use of participatory investigations stand out (especially action-research), which present interaction between the researcher and the participants, the use of data collection techniques such as focus groups and culture circles, and theoretical frameworks for analyzing the phenomena in their complexity. The support of the sociocritical paradigm attributes to nursing the character of a practical science and service to the community, being committed to social transformation by empowering people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 30% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#567
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,783
of 446,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.