↓ Skip to main content

Atuação da equipe de enfermagem frente à sexualidade de idosas institucionalizadas*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atuação da equipe de enfermagem frente à sexualidade de idosas institucionalizadas*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/s1980-220x2017017903302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larissa Venturini, Margrid Beuter, Marinês Tambara Leite, Jamile Laís Bruinsma, Carolina Backes

Abstract

Analyzing how the nursing team performs in facing the sexuality in the daily lives of institutionalized elderly women. A qualitative and descriptive study carried out in a Nursing Home in the southern region of Brazil. Data were collected from April to July 2016 through a semi-structured interview and submitted to the French Discourse Analysis of Michel Pêcheux. The study complied with the norms of the Brazilian legislation for research on human beings. Eighteen (18) nursing professionals participated in the study. Ideological and imaginary formations permeated the subjects' discourse, evoking the understanding of sexuality, its institutional conformation and the performance demanded under manifestations of this sexuality. Thus, considering the professionals' performance, it became possible to identify difficulties such as embarrassment, discomfort or prevalence of personal beliefs and strategies. These strategies have diversified ranging from the use of humor to direct repressive actions. Understanding the dynamics of professionals' performance towards sexuality allows us to glimpse the need for comprehensiveness in care related to social, ideological and imaginary formations which demand an imperative strengthening of academic and professional training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#567
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,755
of 342,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.