You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiência de amamentação de mulheres após mamoplastia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017020003350 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jhéssica de Freitas Camargo, Thais de Souza Silva Modenesi, Marcos Antônio Gomes Brandão, Ivone Evangelista Cabral, Mônica Barros de Pontes, Cândida Caniçali Primo |
| Abstract |
To describe and interpret the experience of breastfeeding among women who underwent mammoplasty surgery prior to motherhood. A descriptive, qualitative study developed with women attended at a Human Milk Bank between 2014 and 2015. Data analysis was based on the content analysis method and supported by the Interactive Theory of Breastfeeding. 13 women participated in the study. Four categories emerged: 1) Success (or lack thereof) in Exclusive Breastfeeding: influence of maternal and child biological conditions; 2) Maternal feelings: perception about breastfeeding; 3) Decision making on the continuity of breastfeeding or the use of formula; 4) The role of health professionals in protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding: Information (or lack thereof) on the implications of the surgery. Unfavorable biological conditions of the women who underwent mammoplasty generated unsuccessful experiences in exclusive breastfeeding and limited their decision-making, despite their desire to breastfeed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#176
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,693
of 340,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.