↓ Skip to main content

Produção científica sobre assédio moral e enfermagem: estudo bibliométrico*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Produção científica sobre assédio moral e enfermagem: estudo bibliométrico*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, September 2018
DOI 10.1590/s1980-220x2017029103354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Leonid Carneiro Lucena, Solange Fátima Geraldo da Costa, Jaqueline Brito Vidal Batista, Carla Mousinho Ferreira Lucena, Gilvânia Smith da Nóbrega Morais, Brunna Hellen Saraiva Costa

Abstract

To verify bibliometric indicators of the scientific production available in online journals that approach workplace bullying and nursing. A bibliometric study making use of Bradford's law, Zipf's law, and textual statistics was carried out with publications in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, made available in national and international databases, from 2000 to 2016. The sample was made up of 111 publications. The main authors had connections with 91 institutions distributed in 24 countries. The United States, Brazil, and Australia were the countries with the most publications. The populations of the studies were made up of nursing professionals and students, and the hospital environment was the most studied setting. The journals with a higher number of publications have international scientific influence. The terms that presented greater semantic power and high frequency in the abstracts were: bullying; assédio moral; and acoso laboral. Indicators showed that workplace bullying occurs in the nursing work environments of several countries, and the number of publications on this theme has tended to increase. Diversifying methods and study settings is important to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and fight against this violence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 36%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#547
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,063
of 347,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.