You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence of hemorrhagic complications with use of a radial compression device: a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017041003410 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliane Silva Machado Córdova, Lidiane Rodrigues dos Santos, Daiane Toebe, Maria Antonieta Pereira de Moraes, Emiliane Nogueira de Souza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,715,385
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#51
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,098
of 444,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.