You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A implementação de um programa de visitas domiciliárias com foco na parentalidade: um relato de experiência*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017044003361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lislaine Aparecida Fracolli, Kesley de Oliveira Reticena, Flávia Corrêa Porto de Abreu, Anna Maria Chiesa |
| Abstract |
To report the experience of implementing Home Visits as part of the Young Mothers Caregiver Program. The program focuses on the mother-child relationship as an object of care for developing parenting using the attachment theory, the self-efficacy theory and the bioecological theory as references. The construction of this program was centered on materials of international visitation programs, based on the translation of the material, elaboration and validation of the theoretical content. The home visits performed by the nurses lasted an average of 1 hour, where issues related to health care, environmental health, life project, parenting, family and social network, in addition to the adolescents' demands were discussed. It was shown that nurses encountered difficulties in implementing the program. By adopting Home Visits as a care tool with a focus on parenting, the experience of implementing the program proved to be an innovative technology, with great potential and relevance for promoting adolescent care and child development. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#271
of 638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,546
of 334,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 638 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.