You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acute hypotensive and diuretic activities of Berberis vulgaris root bark aqueous extract in normal rats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/s2175-97902017000417077 |
Authors |
Muhammad Ahmed, Aisha Azmat, Salahuddin Khan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#97
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,683
of 347,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.