↓ Skip to main content

‘Big country, giant stadiums’: toponymy of public stadiums during the Brazilian civil-military dictatorship and the discourses of reconciliation, 1964-1985

Overview of attention for article published in Tempo, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Big country, giant stadiums’: toponymy of public stadiums during the Brazilian civil-military dictatorship and the discourses of reconciliation, 1964-1985
Published in
Tempo, April 2021
DOI 10.1590/tem-1980-542x2021v270109
Authors

João Manuel Casquinha Malaia, Rafael Fortes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Tempo
#86
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,359
of 453,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tempo
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them