You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osteogenic tumour in Australopithecus sediba: Earliest hominin evidence for neoplastic disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
South African Journal of Science, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.17159/sajs.2016/20150470 |
| Authors |
Patrick S. Randolph-Quinney, Scott A. Williams, Maryna Steyn, Marc R. Meyer, Jacqueline S. Smilg, Steven E. Churchill, Edward J. Odes, Tanya Augustine, Paul Tafforeau, Lee R. Berger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| South Africa | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 74% |
| Scientists | 13 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#28,628
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#2
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#506
of 381,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.