↓ Skip to main content

Mathematics and economics: We should expect better models

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal of Science, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mathematics and economics: We should expect better models
Published in
South African Journal of Science, May 2017
DOI 10.17159/sajs.2017/a0205
Authors

Isabelle J. Ansorge, Paul Skelton, Annie Bekker, P.J. Nico de Bruyn, Doug Butterworth, Pierre Cilliers, John Cooper, Don A. Cowan, Rosemary Dorrington, Sarah Fawcett, Susanne Fietz, Ken P. Findlay, William P. Froneman, Geoff H. Grantham, Michelle Greve, David Hedding, Greg G.J. Hofmeyr, Michael Kosch, Peter C. Le Roux, Mike Lucas, Keith MacHutchon, Ian Meiklejohn, Werner Nel, Pierre Pistorius, Peter G. Ryan, Johan Stander, Sebastiaan Swart, Anne Treasure, Marcello Vichi, Bettine J. Van Vuuren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Engineering 6 11%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,420,803
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#105
of 1,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,730
of 329,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.