You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Practical aspects of high resolution esophageal manometry.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.17235/reed.2016.4441/2016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Ruiz de León San Juan, Constanza Ciriza de Los Ríos, Julio Pérez de la Serna Bueno, Fernando Canga Rodríguez-Valcárcel, Fermín Estremera Arévalo, Raquel García Sánchez, José Walter Huamán Ríos, María Teresa Pérez Fernández, Cecilio Santander Vaquero, Jordi Serra Pueyo, Concepción Sevilla Mantilla, Elisabeth Barba Orozco, María José Bosque López, Sergio Casabona Francés, Silvia Carrión Bolorino, Pilar Castillo Grau, Silvia Delgado Aros, Ana Belén Domínguez Carbajo, Pilar Fernández Orcajo, Javier García-Lledó, Froilán Gigantó Tomé, Rosa Iglesias Picazo, Gloria Lacima Vidal, Pilar López López, Magdalena Llabrés Rosselló, Pilar Mas Mercader, Marianela Mego Silva, María Usua Mendarte Barrenetxea, Carlos Miliani Molina, Milagros Oreja Arrayago, Francisco Sánchez Ceballos, Sandra Sánchez Prudencio |
| Abstract |
High resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is currently under development as can be seen in the various Chicago classifications. In order to standardize criteria in certain practical aspects with limited scientific evidence, the First National Meeting for Consensus in High Resolution Manometry of the Spanish Digestive Motility Group took place, bringing together a wide group of experts. The proposals were based on a prior survey composed of 47 questions, an exhaustive review of the available literature and the experience of the participants. Methodological aspects relating to the poorly defined analysis criteria of certain new high resolution parameters were discussed, as well as other issues previously overlooked such as spontaneous activity or secondary waves. Final conclusions were drawn with practical applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 69% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,334,439
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas
#76
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,400
of 399,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.