↓ Skip to main content

Point of care testing for paediatric coeliac disease in the new ESPGHAN era.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Point of care testing for paediatric coeliac disease in the new ESPGHAN era.
Published in
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, January 2017
DOI 10.17235/reed.2017.5337/2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Shui Yee Lau, David S Sanders

Abstract

One of the challenges in coeliac disease is the significant under-diagnosis despite the increasing prevalence and international guidelines for serological screening in appropriate patient cohorts. Several point-of-care tests for coeliac disease have been developed over the past decade with the aim of improving case detection using rapid and convenient testing. Most point-of-care tests, such as Biocard, detect anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies, whereas Simtomax uniquely detects anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgA/IgG antibodies. A recent head-to-head trial in adults comparing two tTG-based point-of-care tests (Biocard and Celiac Quick Test) and Simtomax found that Simtomax was superior to Biocard and Celiac Quick Test, with sensitivities of 92.7%, 72.2% and 77.8%, respectively.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Linguistics 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%