Title |
Switching from endoscopic submucosal dissection to salvage piecemeal knife-assisted snare resection to remove a lesion: A preoperative risk score from the beginning.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.17235/reed.2018.5608/2018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
José C Marín-Gabriel, David Lora Pablos, José Díaz-Tasende, Pilar Cancelas-Navia, Sarbelio Rodríguez Muñoz, Andrés J Del Pozo-García, Marina Alonso-Riaño, Yolanda Rodríguez-Gil, Carolina Ibarrola-Andrés, Gregorio Castellano Tortajada |
Abstract |
endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the Western setting remains a challenge. Therefore, other simplified techniques such as knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) have been reported to overcome this issue. patients who underwent an ESD for the treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms were included in a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Factors associated with the end of ESD as a salvage p-KAR were identified and a logistic regression model was developed. a total of 136 lesions in 133 patients were analyzed. Operator experience of under 50 cases and the combination of lesion size > 30 mm and colorectal location were independent predictive factors for switching to a salvage p-KAR according to the multivariate logistic regression analysis. We developed a risk scoring system based on these four variables (experience, size, location and the combination of size and location) with a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89). The diagnostic accuracy of the score for a cut-off point ≥ 5 had a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66-0.93) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61-0.80). a simple predictive score system that includes four preoperative factors accurately predicts ESD to finish as a p-KAR. A careful selection of cases considering these variables could be useful to achieve better outcomes in the Western setting. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 56% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |