↓ Skip to main content

Metaanálisis de la validez del inmunodiagnóstico del virus linfotrópico de células T humanas I/II en bancos de sangre, 2000-2018

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metaanálisis de la validez del inmunodiagnóstico del virus linfotrópico de células T humanas I/II en bancos de sangre, 2000-2018
Published in
Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, July 2021
DOI 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e343861
Authors

Claudia Patricia Orrego Marín, Jaiberth Antonio Cardona Arias

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
#26
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382,771
of 446,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.