↓ Skip to main content

Identificación de micobacterias en medio sólido mediante microscopía de fase invertida y tinción Ziehl-Neelsen

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identificación de micobacterias en medio sólido mediante microscopía de fase invertida y tinción Ziehl-Neelsen
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, June 2018
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2018.352.3471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Rojas Jaimes, Jorge Giraldo-Chavez, Yudit Huyhua-Flores, Tatiana Caceres-Nakiche

Abstract

With the aim of identifying morphological differences in colonies of different species of mycobacteria by means of inverted phase microscopy, nine species of high-prevalence pathogenic mycobacteria were seeded in 7H11 solid medium and were observed for up to 21 days. Additionally, Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stains were carried out for each one of them. No morphological variations were identified among the species grown on solid medium; however, it was identified that all are able to form cords in solid medium in an early stage of growth, being corroborated by the Ziehl-Neelsen stain in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. so techniques based on detecting M. tuberculosis depending on the identification of the cords should be taken with caution so as not to generate a bad diagnosis, so microbiological characteristics could also be established as a minimum time to detect growth, temperature of growth and bacillary characteristics based on the Ziehl-Neelsen stain for each species studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 33%
Researcher 1 4%
Unknown 17 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#370
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,628
of 342,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.