↓ Skip to main content

Discrepancies about external cephalic version in clinical practice guidelines for the management of breech delivery.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discrepancies about external cephalic version in clinical practice guidelines for the management of breech delivery.
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, August 2021
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2021.383.7304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Ramón Ruesta-Berdejo, Jose Galvez-Olortegui, Juan Carlos Torrejon-Becerra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#371
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,156
of 436,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.