↓ Skip to main content

La configuración de las condiciones laborales de la enfermería en el Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires: un análisis en el cruce del orden de género y la organización del sistema de salud

Overview of attention for article published in Salud colectiva, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La configuración de las condiciones laborales de la enfermería en el Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires: un análisis en el cruce del orden de género y la organización del sistema de salud
Published in
Salud colectiva, June 2016
DOI 10.18294/sc.2016.730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisca Pereyra, Ariela Micha

Abstract

The article explores two key factors which contribute to shape the poor working conditions of nursing in Argentina. A first objective focuses on exploring the effect of the occupation's care component, closely associated with cultural images of "inherent" female qualities, on working conditions. A second objective aims to examine the way in which the organization of health services provision in Argentina intensifies the vulnerability of this occupation. Regarding the methodology, the fieldwork conducted in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires included in-depth interviews with key informants and group interviews with nurses. Among the results, on the one hand it is shown how the social devaluation of care is reflected in the discourse of those who perform the occupation as well as in institutional practices and policies in the health sector. On the other hand, it is shown that the decentralization and fragmentation of the health system act as additional obstacles hampering the articulation of labor demands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 26%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Psychology 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,986,161
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#124
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,069
of 368,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.