↓ Skip to main content

Acceso a servicios de salud dental en menores de doce años en Perú, 2014

Overview of attention for article published in Salud colectiva, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceso a servicios de salud dental en menores de doce años en Perú, 2014
Published in
Salud colectiva, October 2016
DOI 10.18294/sc.2016.912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akram Hernández-Vásquez, Diego Azañedo, Deysi Díaz-Seijas, Guido Bendezú-Quispe, Hugo Arroyo-Hernández, Stalin Vilcarromero, Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore the patterns of dental health services access in children under twelve years of age in Peru. Data from 25,285 children under 12 years who participated in the Demographic and Family Health Survey of 2014 were reviewed. An exploratory spatial analysis was performed to project the proportions of children with access to dental health services, according to national regions, type of health service and urban or rural place of residence. The results show that of the total sample, 26.7% had access to dental health services in the last six months, 39.6% belonged to the age group 0-4 years, 40.6% lived in the Andean region and 58.3% lived in urban areas. The regions of Huancavelica, Apurimac, Ayacucho, Lima and Pasco had the highest percentages of access nationwide. In conclusion, there is low access to dental health services in the population under 12 years of age in Peru. The spatial distribution of access to dental health services allows regions to be identified and grouped according to similar access patterns, in order to better focus public health actions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 29 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 32 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,986,161
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#124
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,866
of 327,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.