You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmacy Practice (Granada), March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.18549/pharmpract.2018.01.1236 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Andrew D. Berti, Denise Yeung, Kazeem B. Yusuff, Mohamed E. El Zowalaty, Eyob D. Adane, Sinaa Al-Aqeel, Al-Jumaili Ali Azeez, Edita Alili-Idrizi, Marija Andelkovic, Anil Aranha, Mohammad Arief, Wiwat Arkaravichien, Xavier Armoiry, Omar F. Attarabeen, Nehad Ayoub, Beata V. Bajorek, Paul Beninger, Sarah J. Billups, Jane F. Bowen, Carla Bouwmeester, Patrick Campbell, Vincent Chan, Sharon E. Connor, Larry H. Danziger, Omar T. Dawood, Mark Dunnenberger, Selwa Elrouby, Souhiela Fakih, Rana K. Abu Farha, Isabel V. Figueiredo, Nazanin Foroutan, Lauren E. Forsythe, Caitlin K. Frail, Dan Friesner, Kylie Funk, Caroline Gaither, Casey E. Gallimore, Vincent Gan, Beate H. Garcia, Jessica L. Gaskins, Miguel A. Gastelurrutia, Justin Gatwood, Cheryl K. Genord, Eric Gilliam, Nancy Hope Goodbar, Maxine Gossell-Williams, Quinn Grundy, Line Guénette, Muhammad A. Hadi, Souheil Hallit, Drayton A. Hammond, Racha S. Hawasli, Maria T. Herdeiro, Andi Hermansyah, Ana L. Hincapie, James D. Hoehns, Lutfun N. Hossain, Brooke Hudspeth, Mohamed I. B. M. Ibrahim, Farida Islahudin, Ramune Jacobsen, Matthew Jones, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Pamela Kantelhardt, Thando Katangwe, Maram G. Katoue, Sean R. King, Moira Kinnear, Lisa Kouladjian O’Donnell, Sandra V. Kovacevic, Ines Krass, Sarah K. Kraus, Dragana Lakic, Danielle Larson, Kate LeMay, Benjamin C. Loh, Nicole Lowres, Karen Luetsch, Carlotta Lunghi, Divaldo P. Lyra, Carolyn S., Elyse A. MacDonald, Michelle A. Mancuso, Faizan Mazhar, Lisa McCarthy, Meghan McComb, Michael S. McFarland, Gholamhossein Mehralian, Piotr Merks, Darko Modun, Mohammed A. Mohammed, Aude Motulsky, Tareq L. Mukattash, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara, Sheyda Najafi, Weiyi Ni, Sujin Nitadpakorn, Patricia U. Ogbo, Subish Palaian, Rachana J. Patel, Morgan H. Payne, Alex K. Peaslee, Leonardo R. Pereira, Tracy D. Perry, Yvonne Phan, Stefanie Plage, John P. Prybylski, Lieth H. Quffa, Lul Raka, Allan Ramos-Esquivel, Helen Ramsbottom, Ibrahim K. Rayes, Jadranka V. Rodriguez, Meagen Rosenthal, Cheryl A. Sadowski, Adam Sage, Teresa M. Salgado, Pui S. Saw, Katherine M. Schafer, Tim Schutte, Asrul A. Shafie, Ruchit M. Shah, Alok Sharma, Syed I. Shehnaz, Olayinka O. Shiyanbola, Piia Siitonen, Isabelle Skinner, Margie E. Snyder, Derek Stewart, Aimee Strang, Paul M. Stranges, Khizra Sultana, Satya Surbhi, Halit Sinan Suzen, Damian Swieczkowski, Chelsea L. Tasaka, Ann M. Taylor, Cory R. Theberge, Dimitra V. Travlos, J. Rick Turner, Bert Vandenberk, Sara A. Wettergreen, Charles M. White, Jon P. Wietholter, Francesca Wirth, Amber Young, Tracy Zembles |
| Abstract |
The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 30% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,135,813
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
#136
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,341
of 344,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.