You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Homemade diet versusdiet industrialized for patients using alternative feeding tube at home - An integrative review.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrición Hospitalaria, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20960/nh.1301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Cândido Franca, Sérgio Alberto Rupp de Paiva, Maria Helena Borgato, Cassiana Mendes Bertoncello Fontes, Janete Pessuto Simonetti, Silvana Andrea Molina Lima, Sílvia Justina Papini |
| Abstract |
Enteral nutrition therapy can be provided using comercialized products (chemically defined formulas) or blenderized home-made preparations. To perform an integrative review of the literature comparing the use of both type of formulation. In this descriptive study papers published in English, Spanish or Portuguese Brazil, in journals indexed in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Bireme without the period 2010 to 2015 were reviewed The terms "enteral nutrition, foods, formulated, diet, homemade diet industrial and artisanal diet" according to the MeSH were used for the search. Twelve articles were selected. Most studies showed a level 4 of evidence and were published in journal in the higher Qualis index. Four aspects were evaluated: comparison between groups studying the clinical effects; comparison of the chemical composition of home-made products; physical-chemical and microbiological analysis of the enteral diets comes; articles on epidemiological Data on home enteral nutrition. Industrialized diet is more suitable for patients using alternative feeding supply at home. But it has a higher cost. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |