↓ Skip to main content

Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and obesity in children's meta-analyses: reaching wrong answers for right questions.

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrición Hospitalaria, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and obesity in children's meta-analyses: reaching wrong answers for right questions.
Published in
Nutrición Hospitalaria, April 2018
DOI 10.20960/nh.1492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariela Nissensohn, Daniel Fuentes Lugo, Lluis Serra-Majem

Abstract

Recent studies assert that sugar-containing drinks may play a key role in the etiology of obesity. However, scientific reviews show contradictory results. Whether there is just association or clear causation still is a matter of debate. It is also subject to discussion whether the quality/adequacy of the different studies may influence their outcome. The aim of this study is to explore the most recent scientific evidence focused on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and child obesity and to further analyze the adequacy of the meta-analyses in terms of their results, with special emphasis in the methodology, clarity and transparence of their procedures. Only meta-analyses of randomized control trial studies were selected. The search was performed on PubMed and Cochrane Website until January, 2016. Adherence to PRISMA was assessed. Six meta-analyses were included. All of them showed some degree of evidence of heterogeneity in theirs pool estimates. Two of them showed a positive association between SSB and obesity but the other four found no association. The adherence to the PRISMA criteria was higher in two of the meta-analyses that showed opposite conclusions regarding the association or non-association of SSB and obesity in children. Thus, there is no relation between the adequacy of the meta-analyses to the PRISMA criteria and the results obtained. The use of meta-analysis as a scientific tool still demand more polishing, agreement and spread out use by researchers. SSB are being accused of being a main cause of the existing obesity, but this subject requires a broader approach that includes a thorough analysis of diet and lifestyle and a stronger body of scientific evidence based on data from epidemiological studies conducted in different populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 51%