↓ Skip to main content

Efectividad de repelentes comerciales disponibles contra el mosquito Aedesaegypti (L.) en Yucatán, México

Overview of attention for article published in Salud Pública de México, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efectividad de repelentes comerciales disponibles contra el mosquito Aedesaegypti (L.) en Yucatán, México
Published in
Salud Pública de México, January 2016
DOI 10.21149/spm.v58i4.8030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Manrique-Saide, Valentín Uc-Puc, Josué Herrera-Bojórquez, Carolina Carmona-Carballo, Azael Che-Mendoza, Anuar Medina-Barreiro, Juan Chablé-Santos, Juan I. Arredondo-Jiménez, Adriana E. Flores-Suárez, Pablo Manrique-Saide

Abstract

We assessed the efficacy of commercial repellents available in Yucatan against Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue, Chikungunya and Zika. Protection time was determined based on WHO/CTD/ WHOPES/IC y la NOM-032-SSA2-20I4. Products with DEET (N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) at 25% met the recommended protection. Efficacy was directly proportional to the concentration of DEET; botanicals repellents resulted no protective. Repellents with DEET provided more protection against Ae. aegypti and botanical repellents, including impregnated wristbands, provided no protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 30%
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Chemistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 14 26%
Unknown 10 19%