↓ Skip to main content

Factors Predicting Early Major Adverse Events in the Intensive Care Unit After Successful Cardiac Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease in Full-Term Neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Predicting Early Major Adverse Events in the Intensive Care Unit After Successful Cardiac Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease in Full-Term Neonates
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2023
DOI 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dilek Yavuzcan Oztürk, Erkut Oztürk, Hatice Dilek Ozcanoglu, Ibrahim Cansaran Tanıdır, Merih Çetinkaya, Ali Can Hatemi

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors affecting major adverse event (MAE) development after full-term neonatal cardiac surgery. This study was conducted retrospectively on newborns who underwent congenital heart surgery between June 1, 2020, and June 1, 2022. MAE was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: cardiac arrest, unplanned reoperation, emergency chest opening, admission to the advanced life support system, and death. The role of blood lactate level, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), and cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) changes in predicting MAE was investigated. A total of 240 patients (50% male) were operated during the study period. The median age of patients was seven days (interquartile range 3-10 days). MAE was detected in 19.5% of the cases. Peak blood lactate levels >7 mmol/liter (area under the curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.62-0.82], P<0.001, sensitivity 76%, specificity 82%, positive predictive value [PPV] 88%) was an independent risk factor for MAE (odds ratio [OR] 2.7 [95% CI 1.3-6]). More than 30% change in NIRS value during the operative period (AUC 0.84, 95% CI [0.80-0.88], P<0.001, sensitivity 65%, specificity 85%, PPV 90%) was a strong predictor of MAE. VIS > 10 was an independent risk factor (AUC 0.75, 95% CI [0.70-0.84], P<0.001, sensitivity 86%, specificity 80%, PPV 84%) and strongly predicted MAE (OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.9-5]). Cerebral NIRS changes > 30%, high blood lactate levels, and VIS score within the 48 hours may help to predict the development of MAE in the postoperative period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#214
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#351,540
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.