You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two Years Monitoring of Ethyl Carbamate in Sugar Cane Spirit from Brazilian Distilleries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.21577/0103-5053.20200031 |
| Authors |
Rafaela Bueno, Angélica Tonin, Camila Poliseli, Nayane Sinosaki, Claudio Oliveira, Jesuí Visentainer, Marcos Ribeiro, Valquíria Silva, Eduardo Meurer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#469
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,458
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#10
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.