You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calidad morfológica de frutos y endocarpios del nanche rojo (Malpighia mexicana, Malpighiaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta botánica mexicana, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.21829/abm117.2016.1166 |
| Authors |
María de los Ángeles Maldonado Peralta, Gabino García de los Santos, José Rodolfo García Nava, Tarsicio Corona Torres, Víctor Manuel Cetina Alcalá, Carlos Ramírez Herrera |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Acta botánica mexicana
#24
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,591
of 320,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta botánica mexicana
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them