You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Registro y daño causado por Mimosestes enterolobii Kingsolver & Johnson, 1978 (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en semillas de Enterolobium schomburgkii Benth. (Benthan, 1844) (Fabaceae) en Mato Grosso, Brasil.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta zoológica mexicana, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.21829/azm.2020.3612247 |
| Authors |
Pastor Amador-Mojena, Marliton Rocha- Barreto, Jesús Romero-Nápoles, Rodrigo Cardoso-Snipe, Antonia A. De Souza Mojena |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Acta zoológica mexicana
#9
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,702
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta zoológica mexicana
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them