You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calidad e inocuidad del agua de bebida de sistemas de producción animal: experiencia en municipios del departamento del Meta, Colombia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2259 |
| Authors |
Luz Natalia Pedraza Castillo, Karen Guerrero Pinto, Marco Ferney Mateus Rey, Gina Lorena García Martínez, Luz Adiela Gómez Leal, David Gómez Beltrán, Natasha Vargas Molina, Dumar Alexander Jaramillo Hernández |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria
#46
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,175
of 435,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.