You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Uso alternado de antipiréticos para tratamento da febre em crianças: revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados
|
---|---|
Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.2223/jped.2204 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gracian Li Pereira, Josiane Magda Camarotto Dagostini, Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol |
Abstract |
To summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of therapy with alternating antipyretics compared to monotherapy in the management of fever in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Chile | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 27% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 52% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#230
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,535
of 186,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.