You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Uso de una PCR anidada para el diagnóstico del virus de la necrosis pancreática infecciosa (VNPI) en truchas de campo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.22319/rmcp.v11i3.5242 |
| Authors |
Catalina Tufiño-Loza, José Juan Martínez-Maya, Amaury Carrillo-González, Diana Neria-Arriaga, Celene Salgado-Miranda, Edith Rojas-Anaya, Elizabeth Loza-Rubio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#3
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,349
of 431,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them