You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establecimiento de gramíneas forrajeras tropicales en el bioma del Cerrado
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.22319/rmcp.v13i3.6039 |
| Authors |
Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel, Gelson Dos Santos Difante, Carolina Marques Costa, João Virgínio Emerenciano Neto, Gustavo Henrique Tonhão, Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo, Alexandre Menezes Dias, Iuri Mesquita Moraes Vilela, Vivian Garcia de Oliveira, Pâmella Cristina Da Silva Lima, Andrey William Alce Miyake |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,490,079
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#32
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,933
of 440,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.