↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of patient safety culture in a medium-stay hospital: monitoring indicators.

Overview of attention for article published in Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of patient safety culture in a medium-stay hospital: monitoring indicators.
Published in
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, April 2017
DOI 10.23938/assn.0005
Pubmed ID
Authors

M J Merino Plaza, F J Carrera Hueso, M Castillo Blasco, A Martínez Asensi, R Martínez Capella, N Fikri Benbrahim

Abstract

Patient safety is a challenge for health care. The aim of this study is to identify the dimensions with the greatest impact on patient safety culture of healthcare staff in a medium-stay hospital; to asses its evolution over time and to check the sensitivity of monitoring indicators. Two cross-sectional studies (2013 to 2015) were conducted. The safety culture assessment tool used was the Spanish version of the "Hospital Survey on Patient Safety" (AHRQ). Outcome variable is high perception of safety (score = 75th percentile). socio-demographic characteristics and perceptions of the evaluated dimensions. The association between variables was quantified by Odds Ratio. The mean of perceived safety was similar in both studies: (7.81 and 7.48, N2013= 66; N2015=92). The best aspects evaluated were: "Supervisor actions" and "Teamwork within unit"; the worst evaluated were: "Staffing", "Management support" and "Teamwork across units". Socio-demographic variables had little significance, while a positive perception in some of the considered dimensions was associated with high perceived safety. The most strongly associated aspects were: "Supervisor actions", "Communication openness" and "Problems in transitions". In the comparative study, indicators based on individual dimensions detected changes better than the assessment of the degree of perceived safety. The regular assessment of Patient Safety Culture makes it possible to know the status and evolution of professionals' perceptions. The choice of appropriate indicators optimises the information obtained through these surveys.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Other 5 16%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
#126
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,271
of 324,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them