↓ Skip to main content

Chronic patient activation and their relationship with health professionals in Andalusia.

Overview of attention for article published in Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 258)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic patient activation and their relationship with health professionals in Andalusia.
Published in
Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, August 2017
DOI 10.23938/assn.0034
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Danet Danet, M A Prieto Rodríguez, J C March Cerdà

Abstract

To evaluate the (inter)relation between chronic patient activation and its relationship with health professionals in Andalusia. Descriptive and quantitative study involving 258 chronic patients from the School of Patients, contacted by email. One hundred and forty-two answered the Patient Activation Measurement (PAM) and the chronic patient's experience (IEXPAC) questionnaires. Statistical analyses included correlation study and comparison of means. The mean of Patient Activation Measurement was 87 points (scale from 0 to 100) and IEXPAC scale was 5.3 (scale from 0 to 10), with a directly proportional relation between variables. Males and participants belonging to patients' associations had higher levels of activation. The relationship with health professionals was better among patients with primary education and with <10 years of chronic disease. In general, medical staff received better evaluation, yet nurses were considered more prone to encouraging relationships among patients. The dimensions with higher impact on patient activation were inter-professional coordination and the attention paid to treatment and medication. Feeling confident to communicate one's concerns had more impact on IEXPAC scale. The correlation observed between patient activation and its relationship with health professionals leads to the need to improve the involvement and self-management of chronic patients, as well as to strengthen improved professional coordination and patient-staff communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,719,376
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
#44
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,220
of 323,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them