You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Filogeografía de mitogenomas indígenas de Uruguay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista argentina de antropología biológica, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.24215/18536387e042 |
| Authors |
Gonzalo Figueiro, Patricia Mut, Lucas Ale, Sara Flores-Gutiérrez, Gonzalo Greif, Pedro C. Hidalgo, Lorena Luna, Elizabeth Ackermann, Raúl Germán Negro, Lucía Spangenberg, Hugo Naya, Mónica Sans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 5 | 45% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,654,120
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Revista argentina de antropología biológica
#2
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,241
of 517,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista argentina de antropología biológica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 40 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them