↓ Skip to main content

No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccination: a review of international programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
67 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccination: a review of international programmes
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2011
DOI 10.2471/blt.10.081901
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Looker, Heath Kelly

Abstract

Programmes that provide no-fault compensation for an adverse event following vaccination have been implemented in 19 countries worldwide, the first in Germany in 1961 and the most recent in Hungary in 2005. We performed a review of these programmes and determined elements that were common to all of them: administration and funding, eligibility, process and decision-making, standard of proof, elements of compensation and litigation rights. Most programmes were administered by state or national governments except in Finland and Sweden where they are coordinated by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Although funding is usually from Treasury, Taiwan (China) and the United States of America impose a tax on vaccine doses distributed. Decisions on compensation are made using established criteria or assessed on a case-by-case basis, while the standard of proof required is usually less than that required for court cases. Benefits provided by programmes include medical costs, disability pensions and benefits for noneconomic loss and death. Most countries allow claimants to seek legal damages through the courts or a compensation scheme payout but not both. We conclude that a variety of programmes, based on ethical principles, have been successful and financially viable in developed countries throughout the world. We believe there is a strong argument for widespread implementation of these programmes in other developed countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 6%
Unknown 31 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%