You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Legalization as an institutional choice in the context of research and development.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.113688 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benn McGrady |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,934,253
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#2,311
of 4,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,927
of 186,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#40
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.