↓ Skip to main content

Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, October 2013
DOI 10.2471/blt.12.116806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaelan A Moat, John N Lavis, Sarah J Clancy, Fadi El-Jardali, Tomas Pantoja

Abstract

To develop and implement a method for the evaluation of "evidence briefs" and "deliberative dialogues" that could be applied to comparative studies of similar strategies used in the support of evidence-informed policy-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 4%
Researcher 2 3%
Lecturer 1 1%
Professor 1 1%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 61 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 61 86%