You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.116806 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kaelan A Moat, John N Lavis, Sarah J Clancy, Fadi El-Jardali, Tomas Pantoja |
Abstract |
To develop and implement a method for the evaluation of "evidence briefs" and "deliberative dialogues" that could be applied to comparative studies of similar strategies used in the support of evidence-informed policy-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 3 | 75% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 2 | 3% |
Lecturer | 1 | 1% |
Professor | 1 | 1% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 61 | 86% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 61 | 86% |