↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of interventions to reduce the household economic burden of illness and injury: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of interventions to reduce the household economic burden of illness and injury: a systematic review
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, November 2014
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.139287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley M Essue, Merel Kimman, Nina Svenstrup, Katharina Lindevig Kjoege, Tracey Lea Laba, Maree L Hackett, Stephen Jan

Abstract

To determine the nature, scope and effectiveness of interventions to reduce the household economic burden of illness or injury. We systematically reviewed reports published on or before 31 January 2014 that we found in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Econlit, Embase, MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE and PsycINFO databases. We extracted data from prospective controlled trials and assessed the risk of bias. We narratively synthesized evidence. Nine of the 4330 studies checked met our inclusion criteria - seven had evaluated changes to existing health-insurance programmes and two had evaluated different modes of delivering information. The only interventions found to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure significantly were those that eliminated or substantially reduced co-payments for a given patient population. However, the reductions only represented marginal changes in the total expenditures of patients. We found no studies that had been effective in addressing broader household economic impacts - such as catastrophic health expenditure - in the disease populations investigated. In general, interventions designed to reduce the complex household economic burden of illness and injury appear to have had little impact on household economies. We only found a few relevant studies using rigorous study designs that were conducted in defined patient populations. The studies were limited in the range of interventions tested and they evaluated only a narrow range of household economic outcomes. There is a need for method development to advance the measurement of the household economic consequences of illness and injury and facilitate the development of innovative interventions to supplement the strategies based on health insurance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 23%