↓ Skip to main content

Midterm review of national health plans: an example from the United Republic of Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Midterm review of national health plans: an example from the United Republic of Tanzania
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, February 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.141069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard EG Mboera, Yahya Ipuge, Claud J Kumalija, Josbert Rubona, Sriyant Perera, Honorati Masanja, Ties Boerma

Abstract

In the health sector, planning and resource allocation at country level are mainly guided by national plans. For each such plan, a midterm review of progress is important for policy-makers since the review can inform the second half of the plan's implementation and provide a situation analysis on which the subsequent plan can be based. The review should include a comprehensive analysis using recent data - from surveys, facility and administrative databases - and global health estimates. Any midterm analysis of progress is best conducted by a team comprising representatives of government agencies, independent national institutions and global health organizations. Here we present an example of such a review, done in 2013 in the United Republic of Tanzania. Compared to similar countries, the results of this midterm review showed good progress in all health indicators except skilled birth attendance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Unknown 29 85%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 28 82%