↓ Skip to main content

Data collection tools for maternal and child health in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data collection tools for maternal and child health in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, June 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.148429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thidar Pyone, Fiona Dickinson, Robbie Kerr, Cynthia Boschi-Pinto, Matthews Mathai, Nynke van den Broek

Abstract

To describe tools used for the assessment of maternal and child health issues in humanitarian emergency settings. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and POPLINE databases for studies published between January 2000 and June 2014. We also searched the websites of organizations active in humanitarian emergencies. We included studies reporting the development or use of data collection tools concerning the health of women and children in humanitarian emergencies. We used narrative synthesis to summarize the studies. We identified 100 studies: 80 reported on conflict situations and 20 followed natural disasters. Most studies (76/100) focused on the health status of the affected population while 24 focused on the availability and coverage of health services. Of 17 different data collection tools identified, 14 focused on sexual and reproductive health, nine concerned maternal, newborn and child health and four were used to collect information on sexual or gender-based violence. Sixty-nine studies were done for monitoring and evaluation purposes, 18 for advocacy, seven for operational research and six for needs assessment. Practical and effective means of data collection are needed to inform life-saving actions in humanitarian emergencies. There are a wide variety of tools available, not all of which have been used in the field. A simplified, standardized tool should be developed for assessment of health issues in the early stages of humanitarian emergencies. A cluster approach is recommended, in partnership with operational researchers and humanitarian agencies, coordinated by the World Health Organization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 5%
Other 3 2%
Student > Bachelor 3 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 2%
Lecturer 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 106 87%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 107 88%