↓ Skip to main content

Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.151167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodoor Visser, Jennifer Daily, Nora Hotte, Caitlin Dolkart, Jane Cunningham, Prashant Yadav

Abstract

Maintaining quality, competitiveness and innovation in global health technology is a constant challenge for manufacturers, while affordability, access and equity are challenges for governments and international agencies. In this paper we discuss these issues with reference to rapid diagnostic tests for malaria. Strategies to control and eliminate malaria depend on early and accurate diagnosis. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria require little training and equipment and can be performed by non-specialists in remote settings. Use of these tests has expanded significantly over the last few years, following recommendations to test all suspected malaria cases before treatment and the implementation of an evaluation programme to assess the performance of the malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Despite these gains, challenges exist that, if not addressed, could jeopardize the progress made to date. We discuss recent developments in rapid diagnostic tests for malaria, highlight some of the challenges and provide suggestions to address them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%